If someone from the very early Church were to time-travel to today and visit any number of churches, would they feel that they could recognize where they were? Aside from the language difference, and modern technology, would there be any key marks or similarities that they would recognize, or would it feel like some public social gathering where some music was played and a speaker gave a message? In our Scripture passage taken from the second chapter of Acts, we read about the very early beginnings of the Church, and what some of the birthmarks of that early New Testament Church were.
The setting for our Scripture is immediately following the first sermon that the Apostle Peter gave on the Day of Pentecost, the people’s reaction, and the establishment of the Church in the weeks that followed. The immediate results of that first sermon was conviction brought on by the Holy Spirit, repentance, faith in the Lord Jesus, believer’s baptism, and the formation of a Spirit-filled, Scripture-centered Church. The Holy Spirit had just descended upon the believers who had gathered together, and Peter had just given a message. In his first sermon he proclaimed that Jesus is the promised Messiah, that the people of Israel had the Messiah crucified, that God had raised Him from the dead, and now Jesus is exalted at God’s right hand. Now as we come to our opening verses, we see what the crowd’s response was.
In Peter’s closing statement to his sermon, he proclaimed the deity of the Lord Jesus, that He is both Lord and Christ (vs. 36). “Lord” is a divine title, stating that He has power and authority over us, and “Christ” is the Greek word for Anointed One, which is what the word Messiah means. He also stated their human responsibility for the crucifixion. Peter did not soften the truth. Instead, he preached sin, responsibility, and the exaltation of Christ. Would our time-traveling 1st century visitor hear that in our churches today? All too many churches today never mention sin, that we are all sinners who need salvation, or any mention of repentance. However, a faithful Gospel presentation must include the identity of Jesus Christ, that we are guilty sinners, and the necessity of responding to this truth.
When Peter presented this message to the crowds, the Holy Spirit brought conviction (vs. 37). When our preachers give this type of message today, He will also come in power as He did then. True conviction will include an awareness of their sin before God, taking responsibility for that sin, and also recognizing who Jesus truly is. No one is saved without conviction.
Once they had received and believed the truth, the crowds asked Peter what they needed to do. Peter responded for them to repent, be baptized, and receive the Holy Spirit (vs. 38). Repentance is a change of mind about sin and who Jesus truly is. It is a turning from unbelief to faith, and is a necessary part of salvation. Being baptized does not save us. It is not a part of salvation. It is the public identification of ourselves with the Lord Jesus. Salvation is by grace through faith alone (Ephesians 2:8-9). Baptism is the first act of obedience, not a means of receiving forgiveness. Then after one is saved, the Holy Spirit comes to indwell the believer. This is the permanent indwelling promised to all believers (Ephesians 1:13-14).
This message that Peter preached, and the promises therein was for everyone (vs. 39-40). The Gospel is for everyone - for the Jewish people “you”, for the Gentiles “all who are afar off”, and to each’s descendants “your children”. Are our churches today welcoming to everyone, regardless of race or national origin, educational level, or income? This message was urgent. It was urgent back then, and it is even more so today. Do our preachers have that same earnestness and sense of urgency to see people in their neighborhood saved? Do they warn of judgment to come and to turn to Jesus for salvation, or are their messages only feel-good, motivational talks? The response to Peter’s sermon was the salvation of at least 3,000 people! (vs. 41).
Next we read a brief description of what the early church was like - the teaching was grounded in Scripture, the “apostle’s doctrine”, in fellowship with mutual care for each other, the breaking of bread - both Communion and likely shared meals, and in prayer (vs. 42). Are our churches like that? Do we have frequent Holy Communion, frequently praying together, have doctrinally sound preaching, and genuinely caring about each other and their needs.
The early believers had a fear of the Lord, a holy reverence for Him, not a casualness too often seen today (vs. 43). They voluntarily shared their possessions to meet the needs of everyone (vs. 44-47). This wasn’t socialism or communal ownership, nor was it forced. It was voluntary and motivated by love. Some species of trees, when planted near each other, allow their roots to intertwine and sometimes even fuse together. They share water, nutrients, and support in storms. God designed Christians to support one another through all of life’s storms.
So how would our Early Church visitor feel in the churches of today? Is your church like that of the Church in the immediate years following Pentecost? Is it marked by unity, generosity, reverent worship, prayer, and Biblical preaching and teaching? Those were the birthmarks of the New Testament Church.